InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 9421
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2006

Re: guardiangel post# 27162

Tuesday, 12/30/2014 9:34:24 PM

Tuesday, December 30, 2014 9:34:24 PM

Post# of 30046
Underdawg, It does not matter who the patent application was assigned to. Ms. Howard is the only one who knows enough about the application to be able to respond.

It is also a foolish statement to say other claims can be added to an application. All you can do is remove claims or explain how the examiner is incorrect in the denial of a claim.

You might as well admit that the application is DEAD and GONE. No one is going to attempt to get it reinstated nor is anyone going to respond to the claim denials.

Again, please state what you dream to be Radient assets that would be a positive in any kind of merger.

Radient has one asset left, CIT and Radient has already declared it to have no value.

Radient is no longer any type of shell because it no longer has public tradable shares.

What is left....NOTHING.


I have never shorted nor intend to have any financial interest in this stock. I am not connected with anyone who trades, shorts or has financial interests in this stock. I only post facts and my opinions. I do not post on IHUB with different aliases.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.