InvestorsHub Logo

light1soldier

12/03/14 1:22 PM

#39763 RE: hiroller12x #39760

exactly the same thing i read...
why does everyone conclude and assume here...
reread my posts and you will see that i asked for the real patent number...lmao
everyone so defensive when they should be helping the
new investors do some DD and learn about VOIS...
I believe...
come on hiroller you are better than that....VOIS
sorry not earthrocker or whoever that is,but ihub is not the only
place I DD and monitor...
help others believe, pass on the DD,don't attack them or think they are
bashers for wanting info...VOIS where are you...

Tyromaniac

12/03/14 1:57 PM

#39770 RE: hiroller12x #39760

So i just read into this patent.

The patent says it MAY have an audio player (speaker) within the same unit to play music into the same ear canal that the EEG electrode sensor is in. If you look at the patent pictures of the patent for July of 2013, the idea is that there is an mp3 player (or any music/storage) device that can be used as a storage device for your EEG readings AND can play music/audio into the ear piece that is taking EEG readings in your ear canal.

With that being said, the purpose of the music to play was basically for additional functionality of the device already being in your ear AND POSSIBLY to monitor how your brain waves react to certain sounds, which in turn would be saved on the device.

The patent discusses the use of the "music playing/storing device" as possibly being an Android phone, PC, tablet, etc. and it essentially encompasses most technologies that we associate with data storage. Basically, whether or not the model that they are working on now to reach market will be able to play audio is not fully understood, but the patent encompasses that. It is claimed and therefore they own the rights to that feature.

After all, if this device becomes big, we can't assume people will only want to listen to video games, music, etc with one ear available, so why not integrate the music into both ears?