InvestorsHub Logo

samplescave

10/21/14 10:10 PM

#7535 RE: XenaLives #7531

Well, those are answers that the Courts are trying to get now.

Here's the speculative answers so far:

A. GTAT(Q) could not offer a product of qualities required by Apple.

B. GTAT(Q) could not meet the Production Numbers in a timely manner
as required by Apple.

C. Both?

And with that, I would also speculate that the Equipment of this Facility
is the "Problem", not the people at GTAT(Q).

SOOOoooo, with that, I would also speculate that this Equipment is not
as High Tech as Apple needed, quality and/or quantity.

Maybe Blackberry or WalMart would be interested, but not
a Top Notch conglomerate like Apple.

Sorry~

kbox

10/21/14 10:20 PM

#7545 RE: XenaLives #7531

(I am just a lurker - long hold) but this is the first post that I think encapsulates this whole thing. Good insight -and... yup. :)