Reports from the Rambus court attendees indicate that Hynix attorney's have been attempting to persuade the jury that Rambus patents are invalid using claims of prior art or obviousness as their rationale. Rambus' expert Murphy seems to have successfully thwarted these attempts. As there are 6 patents that have to be invalidated, my question is " is there any specific patent of the 6 which is vulnerable based upon the evidence presented by Hynix".
That's news to me that Murphy successfully thwarted these attempts. The jury will decide that.
Taylor had the last word today. And he said Murphy was wrong, wrong, wrong, ....
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
