Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

Q for Cal-------
A question I'm asking myself
by: fneww
Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Buy 04/12/06 12:00 pm
Msg: 950044 of 950083

Reports from the Rambus court attendees indicate that Hynix attorney's have been attempting to persuade the jury that Rambus patents are invalid using claims of prior art or obviousness as their rationale. Rambus' expert Murphy seems to have successfully thwarted these attempts. As there are 6 patents that have to be invalidated, my question is " is there any specific patent of the 6 which is vulnerable based upon the evidence presented by Hynix". Anyone who could answer this question obviously has to be able to follow the techno babble that has been reported. I for one can't answer this question so I'm wondering if any poster can.