InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 8
Posts 1020
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/31/2003

Re: smd1234 post# 9802

Wednesday, 04/12/2006 5:09:51 PM

Wednesday, April 12, 2006 5:09:51 PM

Post# of 17023
Reports from the Rambus court attendees indicate that Hynix attorney's have been attempting to persuade the jury that Rambus patents are invalid using claims of prior art or obviousness as their rationale. Rambus' expert Murphy seems to have successfully thwarted these attempts. As there are 6 patents that have to be invalidated, my question is " is there any specific patent of the 6 which is vulnerable based upon the evidence presented by Hynix".

That's news to me that Murphy successfully thwarted these attempts. The jury will decide that.

Taylor had the last word today. And he said Murphy was wrong, wrong, wrong, ....
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News