I have no proof either way if the science works and neither does anybody else.
I'm sorry if the company's 9 years of failed claims is offensive to anybody, but since believing the science works involves little more than putting trust into shady, sleazy characters, their historical and ongoing credibility is vital. And it stinks on ice.
I can't see the words in your image but somebody else says the conclusion is "slight efficacy" ???? That's proof of science working? ROFL!!! I'll just go Diwan's statement specifically claiming that Ebolacide was originally a failure and a "slight efficacy" in rodents is a yawner. It's new and approved now? Spare me. We all know NNVC won't get a dime for it.