Replies to post #97643 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[drkazmd65]

I have no proof either way if the science works and neither does anybody else.

Interesting wording,.... If it is a semantic argument you are trying to make - you are at least partially correct

Technically - Science and the Scientific Method 'Prove' nothing. That's not how Science works. An experiment done either supports (but does not prove) a given hypothesis - or it does not.

So,....

To claim that there is not a lot of support for the hypothesis that Flucide work in slowing or stopping a flu infection (based on the mouse model and other data in hand) is demonstrably incorrect statement.

To claim that there is not a lot of data supporting the hypothesis that Flucide is largely non-toxic at what would be clinically useful levels (again, based on the mouse model and other data in hand) is also a demonstrably incorrect statement.

To claim that the work done and shown on the Anti-Ebola constructs that were tested by USAMRIID does not support the hypothesis that the Ebolacide constructs bind to, and successfully destroy/inactivate Ebola viruses under at least some test conditions (for example working far better in the cell assay than it did in the test whole mice) is also a demonstrably incorrect statement.

To claim that the work done with Denguecide formulations tested in Dr. Harris's lab do not support the hypothesis that the Denguecide formalations do not significantly change the course of Dengue virus infection in test mammals is also a demonstrably incorrect statement.

We may not have 'proof' - but you never really do have 'proof' in anything done following the scientific method.

The company (since many hypotheses that it has tested along the way are supported by the data) actually has 9+ years demonstrating almost exactly the opposite of failure.

The only things that NNVC really doesn't have 'YET' are data directly supporting the specific hypotheses that Flucide is effectively non-toxic in mammals at clinically relevant doses with experiments done in the manner that the FDA and parallel organizations will accept

AND

Data directly supporting the hypothesis that Flucide (or for that matter Ebolacide, or Denguecide,...) is demonstrably effective in test populations of humans in counteracting the Flu (or whichever specific virus is being targeted).

Once those tests are out of the way - the argument that NNVC's procedures and molecules don't 'work' float away like the smoke that they are.