Replies to post #153801 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[hogman_5]

run, no, you're not!

[rwehapi2003]

The part I don't like is the lack of transparency of testing goals and resulting success as well as failure.

The Yuma and NV testing resulted in 250K from NASA for meeting the terms of a performance data package. So what was tested? It's one thing to say it was a success in a PR, but for me, it means nothing unless I know what was tested in the first place.