InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MakinBank

05/06/14 2:13 PM

#37719 RE: sunspotter #37718

when did he run this in the past? proof of hired pumpers??
icon url

common_cents

05/06/14 2:13 PM

#37720 RE: sunspotter #37718

What volume are you referring to sunspotter???? REALLY????Again, another stretch by you???? There is NO volume here to speak of and certainly no one "dumping" stock....today's PR was VERY strong. Suggest reading what it says and figure out the most logical conclusion. oh wait, ...that's right...Alonzo is already guilty in your book....I forgot.....LOL..

CC
icon url

hedge_fun

05/06/14 3:44 PM

#37748 RE: sunspotter #37718

That is as absurd as the claim TEMN filed.....

the 8K in January announcing a new TA just so they could upgrade to Pink Limited. The motion for summary judgement forces Huffy's hand. If he doesn't respond in 20 days (I believe), the Judge can rule on the motion and perhaps the shares will be declared null and void as they should be.

I know.....the lawsuit is fake, right? Huffy, Kara, and Zo are friends, aren't they?

Amusing.

icon url

market_twain

05/06/14 5:41 PM

#37774 RE: sunspotter #37718

So the summary judgement was filed so they could PR it? What happens if the Judge rules in TEMN's favor? Will the Judge do it so he can dumps shares?

FINRA wants the case settled to issue a new ticker. TEMN already has a new CUSIP. This has all been filed with the SEC.

The 35 promos you mentioned were likely done by the people that printed the counterfeit CERTS. Of course the promo argument is a red herring. Promos are legal if disclosed. Printing counterfeit CERTS isn't. Surely you know this.