Replies to post #21025 on Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation fka RXPC

[lakeshore555]

NO you are confused. Provista Dx does not have LC Sentinel. You are looking at old information on outdated internet pages.

It is that simple, wolfie. This is not my opinion, it is a FACT, Provista Dx is not doing anything with LC Sentinel or DR-70 and they never will.

Read the definition of NDA, wolfie. It would not prevent UNI from manufacturing or selling the test -- it would merely prevent them from telling someone else how to do it.

The PPS proves me right, wolfie. There is no merger. The only question remaining is: Will RXPC stagger along as a zombie forever like MacLellan's other company AXMP, or will RXPC file for bankruptcy like MacLellan's other companies Edgewater Foods and PortaCom?

[lakeshore555]

vester_guy, you said:

"William doesn't have enough funding to go alone with GCDX..You admitted that he couldn't raise mony..You are right, he raised it through Provista DX. "

Provista's Form D's prove that to be 100% wrong. They specify that the money will NOT be used for a takeover or merger. That money can only be used for ProvistaDx, not for merging with or taking over ANY other company.

Rewese split off the weaker technologies and companies for a reason. Reese is not going to apply any of that money to developing or selling DR-70 and that is all GCDx is -- a business plan to sell DR-70 on the internet.

Radient would not benefit in any way from UNI selling DR-70 after Radient's patent expires. That statement makes no sense.

The LOI you're talking about expired on 12/31/2010 -- we proved that. Besides, a LOI is never binding. the I stands for "Intent." a LOI is not a contract -- it's a marketing ploy, like a PR.

You claim to have bought, and own, a billion shares. That alone is proof that there is no takeover. Under NO circumstances would a takeover group allow you to accumulate that many shares. The best evidence against a takeover is right there, under your nose.

[lakeshore555]

vester_guy, you said:

"Lake your last four posts have to proven..."

what do you want proof of? Just ask. I've posted my proof several times but I'm happy to do it again.

proof that ProvistaDx does not have LC Sentinel in their pipeline?

http://www.provistadx.com/provistaDx-Pipeline.html

proof that Radient's gross revenues were only 5% of their operating costs after Jade revolted, and they lost $85 million in 2010 and $85 million in 2011?

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/838879/000114420412037312/v316641_10k.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/838879/000114420411032218/v218209_10k.htm

Proof that the Radient/Provista 2010 LOI was extended to 12/31/2010 (and not beyond)?

http://www.biospace.com/News/radient-pharmaceuticals-and-provista-life-sciences/197802

Proof that a LOI is not a binding contract? Just read the legal LOI instead of reading PR’s about the LOI. Since nothing happened by 12/31/2010, tha LOI terminated.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/838879/000095012310064927/a56670exv10w1.htm

Proof that CIT was written off as worthless? See the 2011 10K above.