vester_guy, you said:
"William doesn't have enough funding to go alone with GCDX..You admitted that he couldn't raise mony..You are right, he raised it through Provista DX. "
Provista's Form D's prove that to be 100% wrong. They specify that the money will NOT be used for a takeover or merger. That money can only be used for ProvistaDx, not for merging with or taking over ANY other company.
Rewese split off the weaker technologies and companies for a reason. Reese is not going to apply any of that money to developing or selling DR-70 and that is all GCDx is -- a business plan to sell DR-70 on the internet.
Radient would not benefit in any way from UNI selling DR-70 after Radient's patent expires. That statement makes no sense.
The LOI you're talking about expired on 12/31/2010 -- we proved that. Besides, a LOI is never binding. the I stands for "Intent." a LOI is not a contract -- it's a marketing ploy, like a PR.
You claim to have bought, and own, a billion shares. That alone is proof that there is no takeover. Under NO circumstances would a takeover group allow you to accumulate that many shares. The best evidence against a takeover is right there, under your nose.
