InvestorsHub Logo

postyle

04/17/14 2:31 PM

#16752 RE: flyersdh #16749

Not only is it irrelevant, it is extremely commonplace.

I have been following patent litigation and IP investments since the 1990s. Rare is the case that does not involve the shuffling of legal personnel.

It never fails, whenever an innocuous attorney appearance or attorney withdrawal makes its way to the message boards -- exuberant speculation abounds.

Just last week it happened on the DSS board here at iHub. My response then was the same as my response today and the same as my responses the last hundred times this has come up.

I am here to help. People can embrace the reality I am posting, or they can forever drink the kool-aid. It's not my problem.

Looking4BIGcash

04/17/14 2:33 PM

#16753 RE: flyersdh #16749

So, you don't feel that Casper gave ATVI good reason to settle?

Interesting. The SJ, IMO, gave great incentive for ATVI to settle. WDDD can refile.... The Attorneys will always be part of the Settlement; never pushed out of the way. It's the expertise that is needed and to avoid Execs from being sued as individuals...

How do you not know that a 'Business Decision' isn't already underway? Hence the change in counsel... oh, you don't. That was my point all along.

Great discussion though.. thanks for sharing.