InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1829
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: Danny Detail post# 24723

Tuesday, 05/13/2003 12:49:02 PM

Tuesday, May 13, 2003 12:49:02 PM

Post# of 432663
Danny- Regarding your questions, ...

about selling the stock, timing contracts, management integrity, etc., I have answered these questions fully before. Please scan though my prior posts. I will add one more thought on this question, however:

"Wouldn't you be concerned that even if you got #2 defeated that they would be .. focusing .. on some other devious way to enrich themselves at the shareholders' expense?"

No, since in my experience, once a management team decides to drive the share price (versus increasing the number of shares they control), then you would be AMAZED at all the good things that can and do happen for a company.

But, at IDCC, management will not change their mind towards really driving the share price UNLESS and UNTIL the gravy train of free ISO shares from shareholders is finally turned OFF, which I hope will occur at this ASM.

Therefore, I will vote "NO" on proxy measure #2, to focus management on finally working to drive the share price to its full potential, instead of working to increae their ISO holdings.

I urge you and all other shareholders to join me in voting "NO" on measure #2.

Cheers,
Corp_Buyer







Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News