InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 287
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/27/2007

Re: junkHustler post# 16288

Thursday, 09/19/2013 1:46:59 PM

Thursday, September 19, 2013 1:46:59 PM

Post# of 85923
I think it HAS to change the valuation for anyone whose done any sort of serious investigation into the company. If you've read up on MVTG you would know that the company has made no attempt to hide the fact that there is going to be additional share issuances to cover costs and that should already be baked into your valuation. This is now $1,000,000 less that they have to raise. It's also a $1,000,000 in tangible assets that the company did not have before.

This doesn't even factor in making any sort of adjustment for the fact that Alstom, one of the biggest players in the carbon capture field, thinks MVTG's tech is so promising they are willing to throw 7 figures at it for nothing more than the future potential of paying to pair it with their existing carbon capture processes.

I get that there's no tangible asset yet here and essentially the valuation is a representation of the risk/reward of the tech not working out. But I still don't understand how that doesn't cause people to rethink that equation even just a little bit.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent HWNI News