InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 179
Posts 35836
Boards Moderated 19
Alias Born 04/17/2013

Re: janice shell post# 47902

Friday, 08/02/2013 9:17:20 PM

Friday, August 02, 2013 9:17:20 PM

Post# of 224618
California Franchise Tax Board will take his business office as his presence in the state particularly since he claims to be self-employed through that office. He should be subject to California income tax.

A California lawyer with a principal office in California but doing a long trial out-of-state does not get to file partial-year residence and exclude income earned outside the state through that law office from his/her taxable income. Spend 3 months in trial in Tyler, TX and bill $200,000 for that Texas work and California will still tax every nickle of it as California income.

We'll find out. Later next week I plan to submit this information on Eades and the documents to the the Franchise Tax Board and they will figure it out for him.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.