InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 3671
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2011

Re: iluvsitong post# 50192

Friday, 04/12/2013 11:30:32 AM

Friday, April 12, 2013 11:30:32 AM

Post# of 94146
I guess that I do not see the "digging deeper" part. As far as I can see the company has made no claim that is new since the AMF thing first came on the scene, July 2011 was it ? Yes, one could say they have claimed to have hired and scheduled with Intertek, but no new claim as to what they have in hand (in fact they have made statements to weaken the prior claims). But I do not see how hiring a company that ultimately may say that although the concept is there, and the %age of electricity in that shows up as heat is water is such and such, or a company that ultimately might do nothing due to a bankruptcy declaration, or . . . does not appear to me to be digging a deeper hole (in fact it gives the appearance of continued forward progress). In event of the last possibility just posed, it could always be claimed that the company was always acting in good faith but that it became impossible to raise the capital needed to carry on, which would make this a potential ramp out of the hole, or make it a little backfilling so the hole is not as deep.
If you think you are going to be sentenced to hang, do you force that to happen now or do you do anything, no matter how senseless, in order to delay . . .