InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 2173
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/23/2010

Re: On2_addict post# 59811

Thursday, 03/14/2013 1:51:33 PM

Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:51:33 PM

Post# of 60937
>>Most likely the Patent would be sold to the highest bidder.

Who would buy a patent that a lower court has ruled is unenforceable vs. T-Mobile's patent?

The real issue here is Daic's continued willingness to spend money on protecting his special, secret deals with the former BOD (if the receiver rules they are valid), not to mention his tens of millions of shares. He has a real reason to pursue this but until the Texas court rules our suit there is dead, he can't appeal it. The sooner the summary judgment against CLYW is signed, the better. I suspect this will occur soon, with the rest of the case wrapped-up in Texas. The truth is that up to now, TM's lawyers have simply beaten the crap out of ours.

It also occurs to me that with one of the special deals Daic got, unless TM has the same patent overseas that it has in the U.S., Daic, who was given control of the CLYW patent in the rest of the world, may have gotten the brass ring -- undisputed seamless switching ownership in the rest of the world. In that case, it seems Daic would get 100% of the value of the patent overseas and the rest of us would get zero. Does anyone know?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.