Politics and Money

[properlynumb]

Where have you been?
Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
America bombed civilian cities.
Dresden, Germany?

Even today we have been killing civilians for ten years.

Every Rule for modern warfare has condemned it.

I quote:

Jump forward to today. A rogue gov't would NOT likely use tanks, grenade launchers, or nuclear weapons in a civil insurgence, but they WOULD use semi-automatic rifles, hence, the amendment applies directly to these kinds of weapons today and protects that RIGHT for every citizen who is law-abiding.

Will you defend the law? Or is the elimination of enemy civilians justification for wining a war?
You think America is justified in taking civilian lives in Vietnam?
Iraq?
Afghanistan?

Your quote:

The key is PUNISHMENT when someone is NOT law-abiding, rather than the common left position of nice jails, college degrees, right to sue, early release, rehabilitation, no death penalty, etc.

We, Americans, have killed thousands, millions of civilians.