You are obviously very angry. It is okay that you are angry. From what I gather, you have lost an incredible amount of money on an extremely risky stock. I suppose, if anyone had thrown large amounts of their retirement into an extremely risky endeavor, they would be angry about the decision. This decision would call into question their own judgement, and when faced with the realization of making a gigantic mistake on a risky investment, it is preferred to point the finger elsewhere, especially if one can somehow justify it. However, usually, the healthiest thing to do is to own your mistakes. Owning our mistakes helps us learn from them, alter our behaviors, and reduce our stress.
Anger Clouds the Mind
We understand. You are mad. You want the leadership changed in EXS. However, understand that the rest of us, who are not angry, do not see a change in leadership as a worthwhile endeavor. Turning the reigns over to another group of individuals with close to 200M shares diluted will not prevent further dilution. Regardless of a change in management, dilution is required, and dilution would have been required even if we changed management 1 year ago, when you were pumping up this stock. Selling stock is how exploration companies fund their operations, which do not produce any revenue.
We understand that exploration companies do not produce revenue and require dilution to fund operations. We accept it as a lay of the land, and when a company fails, we move on. It is expected that an exploration company will fail. Most of them do. That is why we only invest "play" money.
Being mad changes nothing. Changing leadership would change nothing in regards to share price. Potentially, it would make things worse because we would have less experienced eyes working for us, in terms of our properties. CD has been with us for years.
Lastly, there was a vote to change leadership. Those with the most invested (millions of dollars) voted to keep with the current leadership. This is significant, and one should carefully consider why the richest shareholders, also the most likely informed shareholders, would vote to keep the existing leadership.
Kindest regards,
Gregory_
