Ray, you hit the nail the head!
I find it very interesting that you have come up with the same arguments as I have done years ago for eliminating the Residual Buy, and from that thinking I came up with Vortex AIM.
By making the Portfolio Control the same as the Stock Value after each purchase this would probably eliminate any Residual Buy amount created by that new purchase. It would be almost like beginning a new AIM program with each consecutive new Buy. Regardless, the Portfolio Control amount will need to be changed in any event with any new purchase. Why not just change it to the same amount as the new Stock Value and eliminate the Residual Buy amount?
It would be almost like beginning a new AIM program with each consecutive new Buy. Regardless, the Portfolio Control amount will need to be changed in any event with any new purchase. Why not just change it to the same amount as the new Stock Value and eliminate the Residual Buy amount?
This is exactly what I have done in Vortex AIM.
PC=V after every Buy but also after every Sell. On the sell side the PC can be kept unchanged like is standard in AIM. Specifically this condition recreates a [color=r]]blue]New Start-Up[/color] after every Trade, with a different CER. . .exactly as you pointed out!
Mind you, I am not claiming that this feature makes Vortex better than AIM because the PC Update is still different, and depends on the value of the Aggression Factors. Vortex creates different trades for to the same price difference than AIM.
