InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[F6]

loop -- even with SEC involvement,

I suggest, and find it quite hard not to believe, that IDCC would not make any direct disclosure of (heretofore factually quite strictly) confidential licensing/alliance/whatever agreements, in whole or in any part, absent a court order compelling it to do so -- unless it were doing so with the express foreknowledge and consent of the involved licensee(s)/partner(s)/whoever(s) [as well as of Judge Lynn, if and to whatever extent her foreknowledge of and consent to such disclosure might conceivably be required or appropriate in the ERICY case]