InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 19489
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: laranger post# 125675

Monday, 09/12/2005 12:34:50 PM

Monday, September 12, 2005 12:34:50 PM

Post# of 432775
Now we can understand why Nokia's Provision for Infringement was always higher than IDCC's estimates..Perhaps the difference was for Qualcomm..For Nokia to breach a contract, would of necessity have been triggered by non-payment of royalty, correct? TIA

Nokia is looking to weasle out of another contract, this time it's QCOM. Anti-Trust is comming Nokia's way

8/30/05 154 Stipulated Order by Judge Rudi M. Brewster: Nokia shall answer or otherwise respond to Qualcomm's first Supplemental Complaint for Breach of Contract and Specific
Performance no later than 20 days after the filing of the First Supplemental Complaint for Breach of Contract and Specific Performance. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal and record in the matter of Qualcomm Incorporated's First Supplemental Complaint for Breach of Contract and Specific Performance. (ryc)
[Entry date 09/01/05]




mschere

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News