Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:10:22 PM
1. The meeting did take place. This disproves those that said no such meeting took place and Dean was blowing smoke about the meeting.
2. Actual proprietary information was discussed and this was not a meeting where they were just shooting the breeze and trying to pass time discussing nothing.
3. There are actually intellectual property rights that Dean and company own (i.e. patents, etc.). This disproves the naysayers who claimed the patents either expired or were owned by another party.
Not a total loss on the information received. Yes, it would have been great to get the 'fly on the wall' view of the meeting, but it looks like that will not happen. So we wait for more news. Please ask for reconsideration. The more information we get the more we know about things and can prove or disprove the speculation that surrounds us.
Keeping it real.
Homer
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM