InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 86
Posts 4055
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/14/2006

Re: MONICALAW post# 363976

Saturday, 02/18/2012 5:11:12 PM

Saturday, February 18, 2012 5:11:12 PM

Post# of 729971
IMO, it was a combination of TPS receiving a seat on the trust advisory board, an allowed general claim, attorney expenses (and fees?), etc. Also, during their negotiations with debtors re: objection to the plan, I am sure they received "inside information" (upon signature of non-disclosure) that was convincing and rescinded their non-acceptance vote of the plan.

TPS has a LOT third parties they want to go after. The list of possible defendants were obtained from the Wamu Senate hearings.

I don't believe that TPS would huff and puff for "just 5%" extra.

I am just surprised they didn't go for the entire liquidation trust. They had good standing.

imo

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News