InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 2463
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/23/2002

Re: Toofuzzy post# 35106

Wednesday, 12/14/2011 7:52:12 PM

Wednesday, December 14, 2011 7:52:12 PM

Post# of 47155
Hi TooFuzzy!
I was not intending to open a new debate on this. I simply stated(just like Clive did) that if you AIM two stock that exhibit price cycles you reap the profits of both. It makes no difference if these stocks are near inverses of each other or not. . . It is clear that if one stock rises as the other one drops you do not run out of cash easily. . .that's clearly a bonus!

I do not understand your point on your statement:

. . .no matter what you pick they will NOT act exactly as inverses each other and the one that is supposed to be the "inverse" fund will not track accurately

Who claimed that it was required that they should de be exact inverses??? That is clearly irrelevant!
What do you mean by that the inverse fund will not "track" accurately ?????
Whatever it is. . .by the argument in the opening statement it would not be relevant anyway, so it is only curiosity that makes me ask itsmile

Conrad Winkelman
What is Vortex AIMing? Look for my Vortex Discussion Forum:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1341

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.