InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252864
Next 10
Followers 14
Posts 898
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/07/2011

Re: RockRat post# 131843

Sunday, 11/27/2011 7:13:18 AM

Sunday, November 27, 2011 7:13:18 AM

Post# of 252864
Rockrat, thanks for your analysis. From the table of contents in the document, doesn't the inequitable conduct case seem to be rather strong for MNTA? This is pretty harsh stuff about Dr. Pinchasi. This is just from a cursory glance of the table of contents smile


FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RELATING TO
DEFENDANTS’ INEQUITABLE CONDUCT DEFENSE ......................... 222

...
...

(v) Dr. Pinchasi’s Intent to Deceive ....................................................... 260

(1) Dr. Pinchasi’s Lacked Credibility .................................................... 260

(2) Dr. Pinchasi’s Documents Do Not Establish Good Faith ..................... 262

(3) Dr. Pinchasi’s Motive to Lie to the PTO ............................................ 269

(4) Dr. Pinchasi Took Inconsistent Positions With the FDA and PTO ........ 273


C.Conclusions of Law ................................................................. 277

(i) The Materiality of the April 1994 Data Table and the RBL
Degranulation Information........................................................... 277

(ii) Dr. Pinchasi Had An Intent to Deceive the PTO ......................... 285
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.