Rockrat, thanks for your analysis. From the table of contents in the document, doesn't the inequitable conduct case seem to be rather strong for MNTA? This is pretty harsh stuff about Dr. Pinchasi. This is just from a cursory glance of the table of contents
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RELATING TO DEFENDANTS’ INEQUITABLE CONDUCT DEFENSE ......................... 222
... ...
(v) Dr. Pinchasi’s Intent to Deceive ....................................................... 260
(1) Dr. Pinchasi’s Lacked Credibility .................................................... 260
(2) Dr. Pinchasi’s Documents Do Not Establish Good Faith ..................... 262
(3) Dr. Pinchasi’s Motive to Lie to the PTO ............................................ 269
(4) Dr. Pinchasi Took Inconsistent Positions With the FDA and PTO ........ 273
C.Conclusions of Law ................................................................. 277
(i) The Materiality of the April 1994 Data Table and the RBL Degranulation Information........................................................... 277
(ii) Dr. Pinchasi Had An Intent to Deceive the PTO ......................... 285
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.