Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[es1]

So all this talk about the 54bil claim makes me question something.

I may not be understanding it right but...

in a nutshell

The 54 billion claim was not vetted and therefore is not a valid claim

Many of the people here are sure this is a deal breaker. No offense is intended here but the people claiming this is a deal breaker are also very strong supporters of Susmans team.

So my question is if Susmans team is so good how is it that some posters here can see a deal breaker but SS has never even brought this up.

If the fact that the deal was not vetted is enough to screw the GSA I would think a crack team like SS has would not have missed this.

If it is a deal breaker now it was a deal breaker the day after the GSA was submitted. Why has SS not brought this up long before today? It seems to be that a deal breaker this big is not something they would have missed and not something they would just put off till the judge is tired and sends us to mediation.

Is it possible that SS knows something about this "Deal breaker" that the rest of us do not know? Maybe it is not really a deal breaker we think it is.

I know nothing about these rules but it seems logical that if a bunch of common share holders know this, our well paid well informed lawyers would know it too. If they did they would have brought it up a long time ago