InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 5535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: janice shell post# 15287

Saturday, 09/17/2011 3:28:45 PM

Saturday, September 17, 2011 3:28:45 PM

Post# of 221944
They seem to elude from anything current about the "new" CRWV and how the company is totally the opposite of "complete transparency", is not just riddled with red flags, but is nothing but red flags along with trying to impose some impression that CRWV may be some "golden opportunity".

IMO they are either totally incompetent researchers and lack the talent to do REAL DD on current events or they may be just some "wolf in sheep's clothing" to lure in some more flock just to get eaten later.

They are definitely not coming up to par with their DD on CRWV and need to step it up a bit to say the least if they really want to have the respect to what they are calling themselves and trying to infer what they are about.

But, not needed if just trying to form a large "flock". They only need to go after the naive, seem to have an appearance of diligence and do faux interviews with CEO's that are only another form of pumping and advertising for a company.

Using a trend candle chart with volume below, "bottom" of the trend and end of dumping is nowhere in sight and lull in volume may indicate a small amount of uptick and "rejuvenating" the masses but will more than likely just fall more and more dumping will occur, the projection of the overall downward trend will just continue as it is.

Also when calculating average volume, one must look at exactly what numbers are being taken and for what time span. This "new" company just came out of nowhere with a very large P&D tactic, dumping and wash trading effect those numbers also.


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.