InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 5535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: letmehugu post# 25009

Tuesday, 07/05/2011 9:30:05 PM

Tuesday, July 05, 2011 9:30:05 PM

Post# of 37477
Among the myriad of other dubious consulting, legal battles (or illegal battles), shell involvement, and legal counseling that can produce links, the guy has followed up with giving money to known foreign scam stock promoters or promotions with this article, a little more current.

The transaction summary also shows a deposit of $50,000 into Winner International's Hong Kong bank account that came from an entity called the Kagel Family Trust.

David L. Kagel, a California attorney, has voting control over the shares held by the trust. The SEC brought charges against Kagel in the 1990s, alleging that he orchestrated a fraudulent scheme to take a company public through a reverse merger. A judge found that he prepared filings that contained false and misleading statements, committed "repeated and deliberate'' violations of federal securities law and he tried to conceal the violations after a specific inquiry by regulators.

The financial summary does not include any explanation for why Molinsky or the Kagel Family Trust provided money to Winner International. Neither appears in the SEC filings of any of the companies connected to Kelley.



Full story here
http://sharesleuth.com/investigations/2011/01/you-wont-find-s-paul/

The old happened a decade ago just doesn't fly. What part of "permanent" needs to be understood? Like that means forever. The old decade ago theme is used in statements like “lifelong oil man”. What’s good for the goose, one knows the rest. It is the legal counsel given by the company and any “thinking” otherwise will have to be information from the company. Name the legal counsel.

Still not too good of “getting ducks in a row”, or is it? Depends on what “ducks” the company needs to look at I guess. Personally I would rather see different actions or decisions for those “ducks” to instill a “real” company instead of the same old pinky “up list talk”.

The legal council of BNPD and what type of supposed professionals associated with this company has everything to do with BNPD. Especially if they want to deal with the SEC and other regulatory bodies.