InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 653
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/05/2009

Re: wamuvoodoo post# 315471

Wednesday, 06/29/2011 4:48:53 PM

Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:48:53 PM

Post# of 731981
While it would have been great if the EC had received everything they had asked for, today wasn't a total loss. We do get more info from Aurelius.

I can only assume that the primary reason for this motion to compel from the EC was to elicit more information, ie objections and argument, from the HF's about their position on the merits of the IT claims.

None of us really know what discovery bombshells, if any, the EC has, but everyone now knows a lot about the HF's(specifically Aurelius) defense to the claims.

And as JMW stated, claims of IT have not even been presented yet to the Court by the EC. It speaks volumes that the EC hasn't even made any specific or direct claims of IT to the Court, and the HF's have been positing their "excuses" and/or justifications for insider trading and providing reasoning as to why their insider trading wasn't actually, "insider trading".
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News