American Pacific Commerce Group (APRM)

[tillyman]

To # 1. The address is the company's address and that of the proxy holder as required by Rule. Certainly they converted less than 10% each so the shares would not be restricted, no doubt.

To # 2. Holding a proxy is not a conflict of interest. The conflict you’re referring to was when MGI was involved with APRM, Talarico had to abstain from the conversation which the Disclosure Form clearly states. (here I go doing your homework again: Annual Disclosure Form, page 18 Item D. 1, last sentence, 1st paragraph)

So ‘what is your point’?

To #3. There are 4 companies that own the shares and 4 individuals. If you know that any of them are related to Talarico, MGI or APRM you should report it to the Board here and then the SEC. Facts here CBO no more "i guess". Unless you know something as a fact you should stop, your beginning to look foolish. If any of them are related under the Rule that would be a clear violation. No way any off those people or company’s get in trouble for a sub-penny stock, I don’t buy it. (neither does anyone else).

Anytime you’d like to apologize to the board for making outlandish comments you’re more than welcome to do so. Yeah right!