American Pacific Commerce Group (APRM)

[Coniba]

1. Each person listed owns 9.2%. All those people have their address listed as the same.. which is MGI's address. Raymond Talarico runs/controls MGI. They are carefully listed seperately under 10%, so there is no sale restriction, or other filings needed if they were of 10% (such as a 13d / 13g). I personally (obviously you do not) find it shady that they are not listed as one entity with MGI owning 48% for the reasons. If they were then they would have to file a 13d and we would find out a ton of info about why MGI owns the shares and their intentions behind. They would also have to nofity the public when they sell their shares. But Im sure Talarico doesn't want to get into that.

2. I understand it says Talarico is a "proxy holder" because their is a huge conflict of interest (not my words... this is taken from the filings). But the other 5 people who hold the 48% of shares are not. so what is your point?

4. LOL this is funny. "The company doesn't own the shares, nor does Talarico. The people listed do".
The people listed work for MGI group....Raymond Talaricos company! MGI group was given these shares due to a debt that APRM couldn't pay. They don't own the sahres MGI does. They listed them under seperate employess name for the reason I listed in #1. Why not just list them all under MGI groups name ? Answer me that.