InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,537.02
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
19,641.60
(
0.83%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.00
(
-0.06%
)
Brent Oil
87.02
(
-0.36%
)
Bitcoin
56,831.13
(
-0.26%
)
Post# of 47146
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Conrad

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 13
Posts 2463
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/23/2002

Conrad

Member Level

Re: ls7550 post# 34071

Friday, 03/04/2011 9:14:47 AM

Friday, March 04, 2011 9:14:47 AM

Post# of 47146
Clive,
On average B&H made 2% higher average yearly gains than AIM across all 1000 x 2 year random samples (9.5% AIM. 11.4% B&H) but did so with over twice the volatility (6.4% AIM stdev versus 13.8% B&H stdev).

Annualised AIM 9.4% versus B&H 9.9%

In this analysis you start out with the remark that ROCAR for AIM is normally higher than the B*H Yield.

In the above it was not specifically mentioned but I assume that these results are not the ROCAR yields for AIM. Are both these yields

AIM = 9.4%
B&H = 9.9%

based on the investments in equity so that the AIM yield is correctly compared to B&H yield?

I would have expected the AIM yield to be closer to 15%.

Conrad Winkelman
What is Vortex AIMing? Look for my Vortex Discussion Forum:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1341

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up