That was not very fuzzy! I do not recall any body telling me that in such simple terms.
If that is the essence of LD-AIM then would result, relative to Standard AIM:
Buy={(PC-V)-sV)}*2. . . .Relative to the Standard AIM
Sell={ (V-PC)-sV}*2 . . .Relative to the Standard AIM
Of course, in practice due to also the SAFE Value s, I presume the LD-Trades would not always be exactly double the value of the Standard AIM but approximately so.
Considering that because also due to the correction sV the actual Trades may look something like this:
Buy={(PC-V)}*1,9. . or something like it, Relative to the Standard AIM
Sell={(V-PC)}*1,9 . or something like it, Relative to the Standard AIM
Possibly it may even be so that the multiplying factors would automatically be different for buying and selling, because Residual Trade Feature of the Standard AIM algorithm that creates different results for the buying and the selling.
Is this then not exactly like the Vortex AIM Trade Algorithm, in which the factor 1,9 or 2,1 (or whatever) could be set without the use of virtual shares???. . .I do not see the difference.
If so, then I congratulate Grabber for his LD-AIM, and I now understand the comments of Old No. 7 to me in regards that my efforts "taking profits a little at the time" were more or less the same as the efforts of Grabbers LD AIM
The reason I did not understand that is that, in my opinion, every AIMER has that effort as his goal.
It is the very essence of AIM.
