InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 2463
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/23/2002

Re: dougburkeaz post# 33669

Saturday, 01/29/2011 9:00:02 AM

Saturday, January 29, 2011 9:00:02 AM

Post# of 47133
Doug,
Thanks, but here is not need to do that. In order to mimic your Back Test I would need to adjust the Excel spread for 133 lines manually on the monthly price run. If I plug in the daily prices In have to put in about 3800+ lines in the program and still do manual corrections if I have use a different date for executing a trade that was calculated on the prices of the previous trading day.

Considering all that I would have to rewrite the spread sheet. As I mentioned in my previous post the comparison would still mean noting as Vortex does not have a Standard By The Book default version. . . any outcome would simply be the result of how I decided to set the initial conditions for the trading aggression factors

I have done the 3 optimisation runs on monthly prices and that is more than enough work already.

The SPY prices showed a 10% loss over the 11 year period for the Buy & Hold case. With the ROTAI yield of between 6% and 15 % per year for the two relevant runs it becomes clear that an AIM-like strategy can work winders relative to the Buy and Hold method.

My 3 Optimization Results can be viewed on

http://hubpages.com/hub/robertlichelloAIMSystem



Conrad Winkelman
What is Vortex AIMing? Look for my Vortex Discussion Forum:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1341

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.