MiltonTonic you make a good point in in telling us that what the TSA was looking for was not what IDOI could have provided. It's interesting how this agency felt so confident that a dozen companies were going to file an application that they only provided 30 days for filing from Jan.26 to Feb.26, 2009--they did not want every cat and dog to file applications to get a contract. I must assume that in January 2009 IDOI had just completed the early model of the MAG and probably was not enven qualified to apply (nor was CEIA). I have a feeling that things have changed since then. Look how hard IDOI must have worked to move from one model to the next and finally around last November (2010) they even had to modify the height of the two sides of the MAG to accommodate the European Union requirements. I have a feeling that the process of moving as fast as possible to achieve the last MAG model must have cost time and money so that the new technology could be incorporated in the new model. If you don't think that it costs money to move from one level to next high tech standard model then you should think twice before you assume that the money to pay for the new technology was just created in IDOI printing presses. Some of those investors who had advanced money must have advanced more money in exchange of stocks rather than give up and lose everything (what would you have done?). Now, that we know that IDOI is trying very hard to succeed we must speculate on one thing only:
WILL IT BE CEIA THE FIRST TO PRODUCE A MACHINE THAT DETECTS EXPLOSIVES OR WILL IT BE IDOI? One of these two will succeed unless there is some other company on horizon; let's hope it's IDOI who wins the race.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.