InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,699.94
(
-0.17%
)
US TECH 100
19,258.40
(
-0.10%
)
Dow Jones
42,011.59
(
-0.44%
)
Brent Oil
77.47
(
-0.44%
)
Bitcoin
61,012.78
(
0.43%
)
Post# of 358501
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Stocktrader1000

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 52
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2005

Stocktrader1000

Re: janice shell post# 140156

Friday, 02/25/2005 8:01:03 PM

Friday, February 25, 2005 8:01:03 PM

Post# of 358501
Well, not really. The SEC is just as guilty of negligence for allowing the scammers to operate without shutting them down. How many months must the billions pass through on the ask for the SEC to step IF this really was a scam?

Perhaps the SEC has something to hide themselves...too many shares in the float, not enough issued? Somebody's gonna have to pay up. Maybe it's the sheep, maybe not.

If that's true, the SEC has terrific grounds on which to sue 'em.

Of course, my statements are just my opinion. All research conducted to reach my personal conclusions are available on the internet and public domain.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up