InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,538.68
(
0.54%
)
US TECH 100
19,738.00
(
0.49%
)
Dow Jones
39,214.40
(
-0.24%
)
Brent Oil
87.08
(
-0.29%
)
Bitcoin
55,558.74
(
-2.49%
)
Post# of 358440
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

CHUNKY44

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 17
Posts 1416
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2003

CHUNKY44

Re: jarta post# 317979

Tuesday, 09/28/2010 7:01:01 PM

Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:01:01 PM

Post# of 358440
The main facts seem fairly indisputable. We know deli made a lot of money over the past five years facilitating the transfer of stock. The question is, could he have managed to structure the deals in a manner where he would not be considered a broker? What constitutes being a broker? That would be the crux of the matter. And that will be decided based on prior case law?

Does it matter if he paid for the stock with his own funds, or the buyers funds? Does it matter if he paid people to "drum up" business?

Damn Right I've Got the Blues.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up