InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 360
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/08/2008

Re: Brungy post# 65832

Wednesday, 06/02/2010 8:31:36 AM

Wednesday, June 02, 2010 8:31:36 AM

Post# of 103302
You can only claim their testimony is biased if you can prove what they say does not reflect fact. If you read their testimony you will see they back up what they say with factual information from reputable sources. If it were biased then Laidlaw, the State and other experts would be disputing it. But since no one is, or can, one can conclude that their testimony will be looked at by EFSEC for what it is, expert testimony from experienced individuals who know and understand the industry as well as anyone in the State or region for that matter.

Read it and weep. The best is yet to come IMO. Like when PSNH backs off their PPA with Laidlaw because they know they won’t get it past the PUC given the facts presented by Mel. Those pesky facts eh ;)

http://www.nhsec.nh.gov/2009-02/index.htm

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.