InvestorsHub Logo

jai

Followers 14
Posts 897
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2003

jai

Re: glennymo post# 275809

Friday, 10/30/2009 10:43:34 PM

Friday, October 30, 2009 10:43:34 PM

Post# of 432953
We need this guy back.

Posted by: Corp_Buyer Date: Friday, August 18, 2006 8:44:07 PM
In reply to: olddog967 who wrote msg# 165256 Post # of 275805

"They were not subject to any incentive change", meaning the number of RSU shares would not change. However, there was, presumably, incentive for the grant recipients to increase the value of those RSU shares and therefore our shares in the company.

Under the latest self serving scheme, for the same company performance, management will now get 300% more payoff on those exchanged RSUs shares than before, at increased cost to shareholders.

This is another significant and unnecessary compensation increase, as though the LTCP was not expensive enough already.

Recall that the LTCP plan in its entirety was created by top management AFTER the independent peer-based compensation analysis by ISS concluded that the "compensation system" at IDCC was excessive and also AFTER shareholders voted to deny management's request for a compensation increase in the form of 5M more ISO shares.

It STINKS.

MO,
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News