InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 449
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2009

Re: my3sons87 post# 272765

Sunday, 10/18/2009 11:13:44 AM

Sunday, October 18, 2009 11:13:44 AM

Post# of 432673
M3S, you quoted WM, ""In the ID, the ALJ found InterDigital’s patents valid and enforceable, but also determined that the patents were not infringed by Nokia’s 3G products."

WM is merely quoting from the ALJs initial determination, while Nokia is focused on language from the ITC.

Is Merritt trying to deliberately muddy the waters for investors by harkening back to the prior ALJ determination in favor of IDCCs validity without acknowledging what was said at the ITC?

If they allow questions, that would be a good one, "why Nokia and IDCC are so far apart on what was said in their PRs.

My own thought is that based on just the PRs, that Nokia was providing the most recent information.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News