InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 132
Posts 30425
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/10/2006

Re: wEaReLeGiOn post# 172637

Monday, 09/21/2009 9:44:42 AM

Monday, September 21, 2009 9:44:42 AM

Post# of 192567
wEaReLeGiOn, please don't spin my posts. I asked you to provide evidence for your assertions of doom in the face of 600m shares being bought in 2 days, raising the price 100%.

If you have evidence for your assertions, just post it and debate from a position of strength. The Belmont and WowG lawsuits have been discussed ad nauseam here.

imo, Belmont will turn out to be frivolous, mainly based on the suspicious timing of the suit, the fact that Belmont chose to PR the lawsuit (why?), and that Belmont wants shares in EESO. Spelling it out in plain text, if Belmont has a case, why did they wait until the buyout frenzy to file suit? Why did they spend the money to release a PR about such a small suit? Who does that? And for what motivation? And why exactly then?

re: WowG, as discussed often the past couple weeks, the court date was postponed because WowG and EESO are negotiating out of court. Why would WowG agree to this unless they were willing to settle? And why would they settle if they planned to part ways? Could be they still need EESO as a supplier, and would prefer to avoid marring their Weds launch with legal complexity/uncertainly?

Moreover, if you step back from the fire and be logical, neither of the suits affects EESO's potential in the industrial, commercial, agricultural realms. WowG is just one market (retail) for the products. And if Belmont turns out to have some teeth, they get a few more shares and EESO moves onward.

How do you crunch that math and end up with EESO doomed?

Seem more likely, vis the evasive deflection of your post, that you have zero evidence and are just making it up as you go?

As always, I'm fully open to the possibility that EESO is a complex scam involving several people willing to risk jail time when it implodes. But I prefer to see evidence for such than drum-beating speculation.

On the other hand, we know that:

-- EESO has products that truly work, vis the countless testimonials on this board and elsewhere.

-- WowG is clearly going through a lot of effort to promote their launch.

-- Zimmerman is now pres of WowG. With his ad firm, seems he has plenty of business to occupy himself. So why invest time in WowG unless he expects it to succeed?

All stocks are gambles, pink especially so. But I still like the odds here, especially from the 0004-0030 buy-in range.

99.99% of all pinks are scams. Best to assume the other 0.01% are as well.