InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

wEaReLeGiOn

09/21/09 10:01 AM

#172682 RE: imiloa #172665

"Could be they still need EESO as a supplier,

and would prefer to avoid marring their Weds launch with legal complexity/uncertainly?"

11.EESO and Hochstedler breached the Supply Agreement in a number of ways, including, but not limited by:

a. Purchasing enzymes from other suppliers and selling them to Wow Green without Wow Green's prior knowledge or written consent;

b. Changing original product formulas without Wow Green's prior knowledge or written consent;



After the supply contract has been breached and the judge rules, WowGreen is free to purchase their enzymes from wherever EESO resold them from if they'd care to. Or they could simply go to another reputable supplier of their choice.

Anecdotal testimony means squat. Scientific testing of claims by a reputable unrelated firm means everything.

Seen any? lol :)


How do you crunch that math and end up with EESO doomed?









icon url

outperformers

09/21/09 10:57 AM

#172716 RE: imiloa #172665

Logic, common sense, DD and the ability to read between the lines and draw non-bashing conclusions....I give a well-deserved mark and my thanks for your excellent post.