A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board

[Conrad]

Karw,

That conclusion on the mixed fund is about the same I hear about all mixed funds: Ergo. . .nothing new. That does not mean I think the fund is not a good one though. . it may well be.

In finding a simpler way of doing something I can remember something similar in the discussion on how I developed the Multiplier "M" in my Vortex AIM

M=1/(1-f) -------> "f" is the aggression factor: f < 1 *

for (Trade Amount) = M*(PC-V)

I sweated "peas & carrots" on figuring out hoe to eliminate the Residual Buy in the Lichello buy Formula and discovered a series expansion that ended up, for and infinite sum of additions
SUM= 1/(1-f).

Then shortly after I proudly explained how I got it Qarel, the other Dutchlander on this forum, showed us a simple short algebraic equation by which the same result was found! I was really surprised (to put it mildly) that his equation was so brilliantly simple.

PS
* If f > 1 the formula works as well, but it would be bit counter-intuitive at first:

1) It would give a Sell Advice when prices are dropping---> Great for Enron-Type investments
2 It would give a Buy Advice if prices are rising----> Great for investments in a strongly rising market (or for insiders)
3) With f=1000 or so it will give a Hold Advice for B/H investors.

So, simply by selecting the appropriate "f-value" Vortex does the right thing for anyone

The irony of this is that one should already know ahead of time what he want to do and if he does then he does not need an AIM-program to make money with investing. . . all he needs then is to "be in touch with the underlying equities" and shoot from the hip...like a John Wayne. . .or else like a Lucky Luke!