InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: 24601 post# 51379

Thursday, 08/19/2004 12:32:22 PM

Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:32:22 PM

Post# of 249312
the entire *context* was about what you characterized as "grassroots silliness."

my response was to Katmai's position that if any such "silliness" entailed plugging Wave, that s/he would perceive it as unethical (to which i agree).

i provided links to the original promotion of the "silliness" including the proposed articles to send to the Hill.

as i've already answered yer "serious" inquiry as posed in hypothetical form re Lark Allen speaking @ a conference, i would surmise that you are quite capable of extrapolating that to the Berger article & discerning what my views are of his article, as opposed to my views of using that article as some sort of purportedly objective & credible support for the wavoid spam campaign.

it is "sneaky" IMO to spam Congress w/supposedly non-biased third-party articles that in fact "plug" Wave, albeit in a somewhat subtle fashion.

i have no problem w/Berger's article in and of itself...

regards.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.