InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 99
Posts 9690
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/22/2008

Re: fsshon post# 74556

Sunday, 05/31/2009 3:52:19 PM

Sunday, May 31, 2009 3:52:19 PM

Post# of 729623
This might mean that the NOLs are more valuable to a company other than JPM because JPM likely bought lots of WMI stock more recently. Maybe.

If it can be shown that JPM does own WMI stock, directly or indirectly, maybe then the motivation for JPM to acquire WMI drops off dramatically. If so, WMI has more of an incentive to come out of BK for sure instead of selling itself.

I think WMI may have thought that JPM was going to make them a better offer and left the 4 billion on deposit due to that. Now, however, things have changed dramatically.

JPM can not have it's cake and eat the whole dang thing itself! Go figure!



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News