InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 35
Posts 5775
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/22/2003

Re: Fullmoon post# 49265

Tuesday, 08/03/2004 12:51:12 AM

Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:51:12 AM

Post# of 249254
kevin_s5

I think it's clear that the decision to not sell more at $1.90 was based on the assumption that the price would go up by the time more, if any, additional financing was needed. Obviously, if management had serious doubts that the price would hold, they would have sold more when they had the chance...that they did not, now looks like a foolish miscalculation or bad judgement.

For sure the SEC debacle hurt...it was announced about one month after the $1.90 PP. Not only did the investigation followed by the lawsuits contibute to share price erosion, all of it together may have inhibited the PR processes, making it more difficult to support the share price ahead of meaningful revenues.

And revenues have been delayed by the slower than expected TPM deployment. The original Intel/Wave boards were basically trial runs and the original NSM SafeKeeper has been tied up in Super I/O integration. Both bundling deals represented Wave most immediate term revenue sources in the TPM deployment scenario.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.