InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,889.80
(
0.96%
)
Post# of 27567
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

MikeWhite

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 11
Posts 549
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/14/2008

MikeWhite

Re: None

Thursday, 04/02/2009 1:22:27 PM

Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:22:27 PM

Post# of 27567
First, Plaintiffs pass on their motion for continuance AND their motion to compel production. Second, PXD passes on their motion strike 3 interventions.

I can come up with some reasons why Plaintiffs would pass on the two items above but why on earth would Defendants pass on striking the interventions???

Are we in process of reaching a settlement? I can’t think why both sides would decide to pass on collectively 3 motions. Seems too big to be a coincidence, thoughts??

-Mike

*Disclaimer: My post are possibly fictional and/or are my opinion. I assume no liability, nor do I guarantee any stock's performance. Please do your own due diligence.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up