Heels, Thanks for the fill in. There are those of us that still have confidence in this company, we just don't say much on here.
I had one post deleted backing up the court case scenario you put forth. If you have ever been on a grand jury, then on a pettit jury, you can easily see the difference between the first groups indictment, and the latters' conviction. Totally one sided input to the first, asking for minimal indication of possible crime, and then having to prove it over and above the defense's case. BIG difference.
Gonna hold with you guys, and hope a completion of one of the projects in the mill will redeem our share price. I think the name & cusip changes would go a long way toward raising the share price, just by correcting the short problem.
One question. Everyone says the companies read the boards. If so, how could the idea of retiring shares held held by Cremel be a newbie to Carol? You, and others, have discussed it on here before, on multiple occasions I believe. Keep up the good work. And, Thanks again. GLTA LC
